AA
AgentAdda Market Intelligence
Comprehensive stock research | NSE: LT

Larsen & Toubro (LT)

Record orders, resilient credit and new product options; core margin recovery is the test.

Reviewed 5 November 2026 after NSE close. Consolidated financials in ₹ crore unless stated.

Q2 FY27 orders₹1.48 lakh cr+28% YoY; conventional energy led
30 Sep order book₹8.54 lakh cr+28% YoY; roughly 33 months of work
Core PP&M margin7.0%Q1 and Q2; FY27 guidance 7.8%
Middle East backlog40%Geographic exposure in total order book

Investment Read

Research cut-off: 5 November 2026 NSE close; consolidated financials unless stated.

Record orders need to become durable operating profit and cash.

L&T has unusually strong order visibility, broad engineering capabilities, and a robust parent credit profile. The current concern is conversion: Q2 FY27 orders rose 28% and revenue 16%, while group EBITDA rose about 1% and its margin fell 130 basis points. Both Q1 and Q2 core Projects, Products & Manufacturing (PP&M) margins were 7.0% against management’s 7.8% full-year aim. The recent price rally has already anticipated some recovery. At ₹4,050, an illustrative base case of ₹140 FY27 earnings per share at 29× gives ₹4,060, close to the market price. The research stance is constructive on the business and cautious on near term entry until project margins and cash conversion improve. The stock also fails important conditions in a Minervini-style trend screen and lacks a validated O’Neil-style breakout. This is a scenario sensitivity, not a price target. Q2 presentation · NSE close

Decision frame

  • Business: diversified EPC leader with deep order visibility and strong credit.
  • Financial test: H2 PP&M margin must rise above 7.8% on a weighted basis to deliver the full-year aim after two 7.0% quarters.
  • Entry: 5 November rally improved momentum; the full Minervini trend template and an O’Neil base breakout remain unconfirmed.
  • Risk: Middle East disruption, water-project costs, working-capital reversal and multiple compression.

Fundamental Scores

Source-checked qualitative scorecard; no unverified numerical rank is asserted.

Demand visibilityStrongBacklog and new orders rose 28% YoY
Financial strengthStrongCRISIL AAA/Stable; parent net debt free at FY26
Earnings conversionMixedQ2 EBITDA about +1% versus owner PAT +32.5%
Trend structureUnconfirmed50-day line below longer averages; 200-day falling
The generic engine’s numerical score snapshot predates the full Q2 evidence. This edition shows source-checked evidence rather than reusing that score as a current rating.

Company Overview

Order book, business mix and credit profile from company filings and CRISIL.

L&T combines infrastructure and utilities construction, conventional and green energy projects, manufacturing, technology services, financial services, realty, and development assets. Its ability to bid for and execute very large projects, engineering depth, supplier network, and financing access are material competitive strengths. CRISIL rates its long term debt AAA/Stable. These strengths support project wins; pricing, execution and collections determine shareholder returns. FY26 annual report · CRISIL rationale

Order indicator Latest reported position
Q2 FY27 new orders ₹1,47,700 crore, +28% year on year
Order book, 30 September 2026 ₹8,53,500 crore, +28% year on year
Order book mix Infrastructure & Utilities 42%; conventional energy 34%; green energy 17%; other 7%
Order book geography India 46%; Middle East 40%; US/Europe 7%; rest of world 7%
Q2 order inflow mix Conventional energy 53%; infrastructure and utilities 24%

Read-through: The backlog provides multi-year work, though the newest order surge is driven heavily by conventional energy. India’s public capex helps, while 40% Middle East order exposure makes overseas execution and logistics equally important to this thesis. Management describes an addressable pipeline of roughly ₹10 trillion for the remaining FY27 period; that is opportunity, not contracted revenue. Q2 presentation

Website Research: Products and Services

Company announcements are separated from operating and earnings proof.

L&T’s website and Q2 call show that the group is adding digital and advanced-product businesses to its EPC base. The distinction is between announced capacity or products and proven recurring earnings.

Initiative What is established What still needs proof
Vyoma.AI / LTN Compute L&T announced an AI factory at its Chennai data-centre campus, planned for 10,000 NVIDIA B300 GPUs, with a Together AI deployment agreement. The release classifies the award as “mega” (₹10,000–15,000 crore); the Q2 call targeted January 2027 commissioning. Vyoma also offers colocation, sovereign cloud and GPU services. Commissioning, utilization, power availability, contract economics, capital intensity and cash returns. Announced cluster capacity is not operating profit.
L&T Semiconductor Technologies Its September showcase covered 40 products and platforms, including a 1,200V silicon-carbide MOSFET, an Indian-designed BLDC controller, compute, secure identity and connectivity devices. It is a fabless products business. Design wins, manufacturing ramp, commercial shipments, gross margin and R&D payback. A product showcase alone is not revenue evidence.
Electronics Products & Systems Management described an initial battery-storage systems order, Kanchipuram capacity expansion and EV traction motors ready for planned Q3 FY27 commercial production. Repeat orders, production yield, customer acceptance and segment-scale margin contribution.

These ventures offer a plausible new-products catalyst but currently have much less financial proof than the ₹8.54 lakh crore EPC backlog. The AI factory also adds technology-obsolescence and funding risk. L&T AI factory release · L&T semiconductor release · Q2 FY27 call

Historical P&L

FY24–FY26 consolidated; owner-attributable profit distinguished from total group PAT.

Consolidated FY24 FY25 FY26
Revenue 2,21,113 2,55,734 2,85,874
PBDIT, company definition 23,494 26,435 29,151
PBDIT margin 10.6% 10.3% 10.2%
Profit attributable to owners, reported 13,059 15,037 16,084
Profit attributable to owners, excluding exceptional items 12,966 14,562 17,238
Basic EPS, reported ₹95.00 ₹109.36 ₹116.93
Consolidated operating cash flow, including finance business 18,266 9,151 16,741

Read-through: Revenue compounded at about 13.7% across FY24–FY26, while owner-attributable reported profit compounded at about 11.0%. FY26 reported profit grew only 7.0%; excluding exceptional items, it grew 18.4%. The FY26 exceptional charge included a labour-code gratuity impact. The annual report’s total group PAT of ₹18,954 crore includes ₹2,870 crore attributable to non-controlling interests; the ₹16,084 crore owner figure is the relevant numerator for L&T EPS. Consolidated operating cash flow includes its finance subsidiary and should not be read as a pure EPC cash measure. FY26 annual report · Screener history

Quarterly Results

Q2 FY27 versus Q2 FY26; reported earnings and operating margin read separately.

Consolidated Q2 FY26 FY27 Change
Revenue 67,984 78,750 +15.8%
Company EBITDA about 6,810 about 6,840 about +1%
EBITDA margin 10.0% 8.7% −130 bps
Profit attributable to owners 3,926 5,202 +32.5%
Basic EPS ₹28.54 ₹37.81 +32.5%

Read-through: Revenue growth came from energy projects, manufacturing and finance. The call attributed lower EBITDA margin to project mix, water and effluent-treatment cost pressure, supply costs, and contracts that have not crossed margin-recognition thresholds. Higher treasury income helped PAT. Thus, the PAT acceleration is encouraging, but it does not yet establish a recovery in core project margins. The Infrastructure & Utilities segment’s Q2 revenue grew about 6% while its reported segment result was nearly flat. Q2 consolidated results · Q2 call transcript

Balance Sheet And Cash Flow

Parent versus group borrowing; advances versus gross working capital.

The group reported FY26 operating cash flow of ₹16,741 crore versus ₹9,151 crore in FY25 and net capital expenditure of ₹4,469 crore. Its consolidated net debt/equity improved from 0.60× to 0.35×, but group borrowings include the lending operations of L&T Finance. At the parent level, borrowings fell from ₹21,935 crore to ₹11,773 crore and the parent ended FY26 net debt free. In H1 FY27, operating cash flow excluding financial services rose to about ₹18,000 crore from ₹10,600 crore a year earlier. FY26 annual report · Q2 presentation

Read-through: Net working capital fell to 1.7% of revenue in September 2026 from 10.2% a year earlier, supported in part by customer advances. CRISIL separately found that standalone gross current assets rose to 276 days in March 2026 from 259 days because of delayed invoicing and project-end receivables. The next test is whether collections and gross working capital stay healthy when new projects advance and customer advances are used. Q2 presentation · CRISIL rationale

L&T has exited Nabha Power and agreed to sell Hyderabad Metro. The latter remained classified as held for sale at September 2026; its expected completion date had shifted to 31 December 2026. Closing the sale would reduce exposure to a low-return development asset. The FY26 statutory audit report had no qualification according to the board report. Q2 results · FY26 board report

Concall, Filings And News

Three consecutive official calls reviewed against later outcomes.

Management call Evidence and change in the thesis
Q4 FY26, 5 May 2026 FY26 revenue grew 12% versus 15% guidance. Management cited delayed domestic water projects, clearances and March West Asia disruption. It introduced FY27 order and revenue growth guidance of 10–12% and PP&M margin of 7.8%, assuming broad normalization after Q1. The full-year order prospect pipeline was ₹17.8 trillion, down about 6% from the comparable prior-year pipeline.
Q1 FY27, July 2026 Group EBITDA margin fell to 9.0% from 9.9%; PP&M was 7.0% versus 7.2%. Lower project execution, foreign-exchange effects in IT, and expected-credit-loss provisions weighed on the group. Management retained the 7.8% PP&M full-year aim while expecting a stronger second half.
Q2 FY27, 27 October 2026 Order intake and revenue accelerated, but group EBITDA margin fell to 8.7% from 10.0%, and PP&M remained 7.0% versus 7.3% a year ago. Water-project cost pressure, supply chains and contracts below margin-recognition thresholds were cited. Treasury income helped the 33% PAT rise. Management retained FY27 guidance despite these pressures.

Concall judgment: Management correctly anticipated a soft H1 and the eventual order rebound, but FY26 revenue missed its earlier goal and core PP&M margin has yet to recover. Since both H1 quarters delivered 7.0%, achieving 7.8% for the full year requires H2 margin above 7.8% on a weighted basis. This makes H2 execution and collection evidence more important than headline order wins. The Q4 expectation that the Hyderabad Metro sale could close in Q1 also slipped; the revised completion date is 31 December 2026. Q4 FY26 call · Q1 FY27 call · Q2 FY27 call

FY26 Annual Report Read-Through

Audited history, with sale status updated from Q2 FY27.

FY26 annual report, updated for Q2 FY27 events

Annual-report lens Evidence Investment implication
Business scale FY26 consolidated revenue ₹2,85,874 crore; order intake exceeded the original 10% growth guide Strong franchise, though revenue growth missed the 15% guide and reached 12%
Earnings quality Owner-attributable reported PAT ₹16,084 crore versus ₹17,238 crore excluding exceptional items Reported and normalized earnings require separate valuation treatment
Cash and leverage Group operating cash flow ₹16,741 crore; parent ended FY26 net debt free Strong parent liquidity, but consolidated debt includes L&T Finance
Capital allocation Nabha Power exit completed; Hyderabad Metro sale remained pending at September 2026 Exit execution still matters for returns and management credibility
Governance FY26 statutory audit opinion was unqualified according to the board report No audit qualification identified in the reviewed period

The annual report supports L&T’s scale and financing advantage; the sale status is updated from the later Q2 filing. Neither document settles future project-level margins, overseas collection risk or returns on new AI and semiconductor investment. FY26 annual report · FY26 board report · Q2 results

Management Outlook

FY27 guidance is a company forecast, not an achieved result.

Management retained FY27 guidance of 10–12% growth in orders and revenue and a 7.8% EBITDA margin for the Projects, Products & Manufacturing portfolio. It expects year-end group net working capital below its earlier 10% guidance. These are management forecasts. CRISIL’s June assessment affirmed AAA/Stable but highlighted large gross working-capital needs and Middle East risk; its downside triggers include sustained working-capital stretch or ROCE below 14%. Q2 call transcript · CRISIL rationale

The Indian capex cycle is supportive: the FY27 central capital-expenditure budget is ₹12.22 lakh crore and April–September actual spending of ₹6.55 lakh crore was 12.7% above the year-earlier period. This supports domestic demand, but cannot resolve international execution or project pricing risk. Union Budget · Government accounts

Sector And Competitive Context

India capex and global risk; recent index rebound lacks broad small-cap participation.

As of 5 November, the local NSE index series shows a strong 20-session rebound in Nifty 50 (+8.6%) and Nifty Infra (+7.4%), while Nifty Smallcap 500 fell 2.7%. Over 60 sessions, Nifty 50 was about flat (−0.2%), Nifty Infra fell 1.0%, and Nifty Midcap 150 fell 5.0%. The infrastructure rally therefore has recent momentum but has not yet shown durable, broad participation. L&T gained 9.4% in 20 sessions, modestly ahead of Nifty 50, but its 60-session return of −0.7% lagged Nifty 50. These are calculations from Agent Adda’s archived NSE index and security closes through 5 November, not a proprietary relative-strength rank. NSE index portal · NSE 5 November archive

The IMF’s October 2026 outlook projects India growth of about 7.0% in calendar 2026, compared with global growth of 3.1%. Domestic capex and private industrial demand support L&T, but the IMF identifies conflict, higher energy costs and renewed trade tensions as global downside risks. L&T’s own exposure makes this concrete: 40% of its order book is in the Middle East, 54% is international, and its green-energy unit reported a 45% fall in Q2 new orders after Middle East solar deferrals. Higher oil can support hydrocarbon customer spending but also raise L&T’s logistics and input costs and strain India’s macro balance; the net effect is uncertain. IMF October WEO · IMF India data · Q2 call

Risk Mechanism Evidence to monitor
West Asia conflict and shipping Site access, transit time, procurement and customer award timing; possible cost inflation on fixed-price contracts Middle East project milestones, green-energy award conversion, overseas receivables
Domestic water-project execution Delayed clearances, claims and cost overruns dilute the very segment supported by public capex Water and effluent treatment margin and billings
Working-capital reversal Low 1.7% net working capital partly reflects advances that are consumed during execution Gross current assets, collections and cash flow excluding finance
Energy mix and cyclicality 53% of Q2 new orders were conventional energy; oil and gas capex can shift with price and policy Conventional pipeline, order quality, segment margin
New-tech investment GPU refresh cycles, power, utilization and product-development spend could outrun returns Vyoma commissioning and utilization; semiconductor shipments and unit economics
Valuation About 31× reported trailing owner EPS leaves little tolerance for H2 margin disappointment Core margin, owner EPS quality, multiple versus own history

Ownership And Governance

Institutional holding and peer comparison limits.

September 2026 shareholding was 19.22% foreign institutions, 42.85% domestic institutions, 0.26% government and 37.66% public, per Screener. L&T has no conventional controlling promoter holding. The listed technology and finance subsidiaries, plus project and realty operations, make pure EPC peers such as KEC International or NCC imperfect valuation comparisons; no same-date, like-for-like peer ranking is asserted here. Screener shareholding · FY26 annual report

Equity Chart

NSE daily closes through 5 November 2026; technical context is descriptive.

L&T NSE daily close and moving averages through 5 November 2026

Agent Adda NSE history, completed with official 4–5 November NSE archives.

Technical Analysis: Minervini and O’Neil

Framework application by Agent Adda; neither investor assessed this report.

Neither Mark Minervini nor William O’Neil has assessed this report. The following is our application of their published trend and growth frameworks, as of the 5 November close; it is not an attributed recommendation. Relative strength here means price performance versus the market, not RSI. Minervini trend discussion · IBD’s O’Neil rules

Minervini-style trend condition L&T reading Assessment
Price above 50-, 150- and 200-session averages ₹4,050 > ₹3,835.74 / ₹3,944.03 / ₹3,934.88 Pass
50-session average above the 150- and 200-session averages ₹3,835.74 below both Fail
200-session average rising over about one trading month ₹3,934.88 versus ₹3,964.52 twenty sessions ago Fail
Price at least 30% above 52-week low ₹4,050 versus ₹3,288.10: +23.2% Fail
Price within 25% of 52-week high ₹4,050 versus ₹4,440: 8.8% below Pass
Strong published relative-strength percentile No comparable NSE-wide RS percentile calculated Unverified

Minervini-style read: L&T has rallied above its moving averages, but the 50-day line is below the longer lines, the 200-day line is falling, and the price is not far enough from its 52-week low. It therefore does not pass a full Stage 2 trend template. That is a timing observation, not a judgment that the business is weak. NSE 5 November archive · Minervini trend discussion

O’Neil CAN SLIM lens L&T evidence Assessment
C: Current quarterly earnings Q2 owner EPS ₹37.81, +32.5% year on year; sales +15.8%, and the EBITDA margin fell EPS passes a growth screen; operating quality is mixed
A: Annual earnings Reported owner EPS ₹95.00 / ₹109.36 / ₹116.93 in FY24–FY26, growth about 15% then 7% Below O’Neil’s preferred sustained 25% annual growth
N: New product or service AI compute, semiconductors and energy-storage offerings are announced Positive catalyst, commercial earnings still unproven
S: Supply and demand 5 November volume 3.84 million shares, 2.18× the prior 50-session average Strong buying interest on the day; no validated base breakout
L: Leader or laggard LT +9.4% in 20 sessions versus Nifty 50 +8.6%; LT −0.7% in 60 versus Nifty 50 −0.2% Short-term outperformance, medium-term lag; no RS percentile
I: Institutional sponsorship FII 19.22% and DII 42.85% at September 2026 Significant sponsorship; ownership alone does not prove accumulation
M: Market direction Nifty 50 rebound strong, but small caps and mid caps lag over 20–60 sessions Selective recovery rather than confirmed broad leadership

O’Neil’s materials favor rising sales and earnings, improving profit margins, a sound base, a clear buy point and above-average breakout volume. L&T’s Q2 EPS and 5 November volume are encouraging, but the annual growth, margin trend and chart base are not yet aligned. No specific O’Neil-style pivot is validated in this report. The volume spike is therefore not treated as a buy signal by itself. IBD investing rules · IBD base and breakout guide · FY26 annual report · NSE archive

Broker And Market View

Dated, directly reviewed reports; target assumptions differ.

Dated, directly reviewed broker report View Main argument and limitation
PL Capital, 28 October Buy; ₹4,437 sum-of-the-parts target Order wins and execution support the outlook, while margin recovery and Middle East disruption remain monitorables. Core business is valued at 21× September 2028 estimated earnings.
ICICI Direct, 28 October Buy; ₹4,710 12-month sum-of-the-parts target Emphasizes the 33-month backlog and improved working capital. Its own Q2 summary notes EBITDA rose only 0.6%, margin fell 130 bps and treasury income helped PAT. Its SOTP base case attributes about ₹3,645 per share to the core and about ₹1,065 to listed/other interests.

At the 5 November close of ₹4,050, these targets imply approximately 9.6% and 16.3% upside respectively. They use different forecast years, component values and assumptions, so the spread is not a statistical confidence interval. Neither target resolves our main question: whether core PP&M margin can recover sufficiently in H2. PL Capital report · ICICI Direct Q2 report

Valuation Scenarios

Illustrative earnings and multiple sensitivities, not price targets.

The 5 November NSE close was ₹4,050. Screener’s reported trailing owner EPS was ₹129.86, implying about 31.2× reported trailing earnings. Adding back the FY26 owner-attributable exceptional charge of roughly ₹8.4 per share gives an indicative trailing EPS near ₹138.3 and 29.3×; this simple adjustment does not remove any other non-recurring gains. Group P/E is a coarse tool for a business with listed subsidiaries and finance operations. NSE archive · Screener · FY26 annual report

Illustrative FY27 sensitivity Owner EPS assumption P/E assumption Implied value Versus ₹4,050
Bear: margins lag and multiple contracts ₹125 25× ₹3,125 −22.8%
Base: moderate earnings conversion ₹140 29× ₹4,060 +0.2%
Bull: stronger conversion and margin recovery ₹155 32× ₹4,960 +22.5%

Read-through: These are transparent assumptions, not forecasts or intrinsic values. The ₹140 base EPS is approximately the FY27 outcome if H2 owner earnings match the prior year’s normalized H2 while H1 FY27 reported earnings are retained. The bear case tests flat earnings versus FY26 normalized EPS (about ₹125); the bull case requires higher profit conversion. The wide spread shows how sensitive a near-term view is to both margins and the valuation multiple. A separate, dated broker view from PL Capital on 28 October put its sum-of-the-parts target at ₹4,437; that is the broker’s view, not Agent Adda’s scenario result. Q2 results · FY26 annual report · PL Capital

The share gained 9.4% over 20 trading sessions through 5 November, though it remained about 0.7% below its level 60 sessions earlier. At ₹4,050 it was 8.2% above its 20-session average, 5.6% above its 50-session average, and 2.9% above its 200-session average. The recent rise improves trend momentum but reduces near-term entry margin. These calculations use Agent Adda’s NSE history through 3 November and official NSE archives for 4–5 November. NSE 4 November · NSE 5 November

Issues, Risks And Watch Plan

Specific thesis tests and downside mechanisms.

  1. Positive confirmation: PPM margin approaches or exceeds management’s 7.8% FY27 target while revenue grows within the 10–12% guidance range.
  2. Cash quality: H2 collections remain strong as customer advances are deployed; gross current assets and overdue receivables decline.
  3. Order quality: The enlarged energy backlog converts into profitable revenue, with no material Middle East cancellations or prolonged disruption.
  4. Capital allocation: Hyderabad Metro divestment closes on revised terms and frees capital without further material charges.
  5. Thesis breaker: Sustained margin misses, a working-capital reversal, or returns falling toward CRISIL’s 14% ROCE downside threshold would require a lower earnings and multiple assumption.

Evidence limits: This report uses primary company filings for financial and operational claims, two directly reviewed broker reports, CRISIL for independent credit context, Screener for historical shareholding and trailing EPS, and NSE closes for price. It does not include a proprietary NSE-wide relative-strength percentile, a verified chart-base pivot, project-level margins, a complete independent sum-of-the-parts valuation, or a same-date peer multiple comparison. Scenario values are sensitivities, not price targets.

Research only. This is not personalized investment advice.

Evidence Trail

Primary company documents first; market, credit and broker context dated.

  1. L&T FY26 annual report — audited history, business and capital allocation
  2. L&T Q2 FY27 consolidated results — revenue, owner profit, cash and balance sheet
  3. L&T Q2 FY27 presentation — order book, segments and guidance
  4. Q4 FY26 call — guidance and execution risks
  5. Q1 FY27 call — first-half margin and West Asia assessment
  6. Q2 FY27 call — costs, new products and FY27 guidance
  7. CRISIL credit rationale — AAA/Stable and working-capital risk
  8. L&T AI factory announcement — announced capacity and agreement
  9. L&T semiconductor showcase — product claims
  10. PL Capital, 28 Oct 2026 — broker SOTP view
  11. ICICI Direct, 28 Oct 2026 — broker SOTP view
  12. IMF October 2026 outlook — global risk context
  13. NSE 5 Nov 2026 archive — closing price and volume